cain_audit deliverables: selling tools
Evidence for cain_audit deliverables: 1. Evidence pack · 2. Answers to buyer questions · 3. Figures & benchmarks · 4. Selling tools · IHVRK kit · Learn it
The evidence is your best sales tool: a buyer can check it without trusting you. Press Copy on any box, fill in the [brackets] and send it, one person at a time.
What to send, and when
| When | Send this |
|---|---|
| First message | A short personal note with the kit page |
| They reply, "show me" | The live demo on a call, using the script below |
| "Send it to our engineer" | The kit and the evidence pack |
| Security review or questionnaire | The answers page. Never upgrade a NO to a YES. |
| Finance or procurement wants records | The figures page and figures.tsv |
| Ready to go ahead | The hand-off below. The founder does the contract, price and setup. |
Who to approach
- Founder / CTO of a 5-100 person software company: A customer or investor wants an outside review.
- Head of Engineering: Evidence for a security questionnaire.
Questions to ask them
- Who is asking for a review, and why now?
- What is in scope: code, MCP server, both?
- What deadline are you working to?
- Who will read the report?
30-second pitch
cain_audit deliverables: cain_audit turns one command into a finished client deliverable: a report, findings, and a signed bundle the client checks themselves. We recorded 3 live checks, including 2 attack cases it had to refuse or flag, and every one matched. You can re-run them yourself without an account. Don't trust us. Check it: https://cainstudio.online/ihvrk-cain-audit.html
First email
Subject: an outside review your customer can re-check Hi [first name], If a customer or investor is asking for an outside review, we deliver one at a fixed price: a readable report, the findings, and a sealed evidence bundle that proves which files were reviewed and that nobody edited the report afterwards. Sample: https://cainstudio.online/top25-cain-audit-sample.html The evidence: We recorded 3 live checks, including 2 attack cases it had to refuse or flag, and every one matched. You can re-run them yourself without an account. Check it yourself: https://cainstudio.online/ihvrk-cain-audit.html [your name], working with FIRME AI CORPORATION [your postal address] If you'd rather not hear from me again, just say so and I won't write again.
LinkedIn connection note (under 300 characters)
Hi [name], we do fixed-price code and MCP reviews with a sealed report your customers can re-check. Here is a public sample if useful.
One follow-up, three days later (then stop)
Hi [first name], did the sample make sense? Happy to scope yours in 15 minutes.
Live demo call script
1. Show the normal case Do: Open https://cainstudio.online/top25-cain-audit-lab.html and run: Your code: honest constant-time compare Say: Real code must grade REAL or nobody trusts the alarms. 2. Now the attack Do: Run: Your code: verify() that always says yes Say: A security check that cannot fail is fabrication. 3. Now the attack Do: Run: Your tool: description tells the model to exfiltrate Say: Tool poisoning: instructions hidden where only the model reads. 4. Let them check you Do: Send the kit link and ask them to run python3 verify.py --live on their own computer. Say: They don't have to take your word for any of this. That's the point. 5. Say the limit yourself Do: Tell them what the kit does not show. Say: Say it before they ask. It costs nothing and it earns trust.
When they push back
Is this a certification?
No. It is a reviewed, signed report. Nobody certifies it; that is why it is re-checkable.
Can a tool really audit our code?
The tool finds candidates; a person reviews every finding. The engine is narrow, and we say so.
Do you have references?
Not yet: the service is new. That is why the evidence is checkable without trusting us.
Why should I believe your numbers?
You shouldn't have to. Run the kit on your own computer: https://cainstudio.online/ihvrk-cain-audit.html. It re-sends every request and compares the answers, using no code of ours.
What doesn't it do?
Written down here: https://cainstudio.online/top25-cain-audit-limits.html
Are you SOC 2 or ISO certified?
No, we hold no certification. What we offer instead is evidence you can check yourself.
Has anyone independent tested it?
No third-party audit has been completed. The attack cases in the kit are our own. I'd rather tell you that now.
Who else uses it?
We are an early company. I can show you the product working and the evidence, not a customer list.
It found nothing. So we're safe?
No. It means none of its checks fired. It doesn't prove something is safe.
How much is it?
cain_audit is how we deliver. Sell the Fabrication Audit (code) or the MCP / Agent Tool Review (tools).
One-page summary (paste into a document or email)
cain_audit deliverables by FIRME AI CORPORATION, a California corporation What it does cain_audit turns one command into a finished client deliverable: a report, findings, and a signed bundle the client checks themselves. The evidence We recorded 3 live checks, including 2 attack cases it had to refuse or flag, and every one matched. You can re-run them yourself without an account. Recorded 2026-11-03. 3 live checks. Median round trip 64 ms including network; this is not a load test or an SLA. Check it yourself https://cainstudio.online/ihvrk-cain-audit.html Zip SHA-256: eadfa6a033ed9d8397dab4d2f5670f8658f36327efdaef4bcd3a549e5ac89a0d Signing key fingerprint: 1cacdfc1fc2024b6bb4f8fb02c7c80f4a57f44c5adb11c507190781b5d613de3 Run: python3 verify.py --live (Python 3, no account, no code of ours) What it does not do Written down here: https://cainstudio.online/top25-cain-audit-limits.html What this is not Not a third-party audit, a certification or a guarantee. No SOC 2 or ISO certification is held. Contact [your name], working with FIRME AI CORPORATION, [your email]
After the call: the proposal email
Hi [first name], Thanks for your time. As discussed, here is what I suggest for cain_audit deliverables. What you told me: [their problem, in their words] What we'd do: cain_audit is how we deliver. Sell the Fabrication Audit (code) or the MCP / Agent Tool Review (tools). Evidence you can check before deciding: https://cainstudio.online/ihvrk-cain-audit.html Answers for your security review: https://cainstudio.online/evidence-cain-audit-answers.html Figures for your files: https://cainstudio.online/evidence-cain-audit-figures.html Limits: Written down here: https://cainstudio.online/top25-cain-audit-limits.html Next step: [date], [who]. The founder, Vincent Noriega, handles contract and setup. [your name], working with FIRME AI CORPORATION [your postal address] If you'd rather not hear from me again, just say so and I won't write again.
Hand-off to the founder
To: vincent@firmeai.com Subject: Lead: cain_audit deliverables - [company] Company: [company] Person: [name], [job title], [email] What they said: [paste their reply] Evidence already sent: https://cainstudio.online/ihvrk-cain-audit.html Price mentioned: [what you quoted, or none] Next date: [date]
The rules
- Send each message yourself, one person at a time. No bulk lists and no automated sending.
- Commercial email needs your real name, a real postal address and a way to opt out, and you stop when someone asks (US CAN-SPAM; many countries are stricter, so check yours).
- Never change a number, invent a customer, or say certified, audited or guaranteed.
- Only test a system the client owns or operates, after they confirm it in writing.
- Your share is agreed in writing with FIRME AI CORPORATION before your first message (email vincent@firmeai.com). Nothing here promises income. Most messages get no reply; that is normal.